Competition Law and Anti-Monopoly Law

The regulation of Competition Law and Anti-Monopoly Law is objectively aimed at ensuring the realization of consumer welfare and the efficient allocation of resources.

Overview

The regulation of Competition Law and Anti-Monopoly Law is objectively aimed at ensuring the realization of consumer welfare and the efficient allocation of resources. Advances in technology and the emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) have driven significant innovations in the digital economy. Business transactions—whether business to business (B2B), business to customer (B2C), or even customer to customer (C2C)—are now conducted through digital platforms that are no longer limited by conventional market boundaries. The rapid expansion of the digital economy necessitates continuous and comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of existing laws and regulations in preventing and addressing increasingly diverse forms of anti-competitive practices.

Over the past decade, technology companies and marketplace operators have consistently dominated the list of the world’s top ten companies by market capitalization. As of 2024, companies such as Microsoft Corp., Apple Inc., Alphabet (Google), Amazon.com, Nvidia, Meta Platforms (Facebook), and Tesla were among the top ten.

As early as 2021, UNCTAD, during an expert meeting in Geneva that brought together specialists in competition law and policy from various countries, noted that traditional standards of economic analysis and competition assessment tools—such as market share and the small but significant and non-transitory increase in price (SSNIP) test—are no longer sufficient for evaluating abuse of dominance and merger assessments involving digital platforms. We also observe that various jurisprudence on the enforcement of Competition and Anti-Monopoly Law in Indonesia has been flexibly interpreted and applied in accordance with the dynamics of emerging anti-competitive conduct. It is not uncommon that certain criminal provisions under Law No. 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition—which were originally formulated under a per se illegal approach—are applied using a rule of reason approach solely to ensure the realization of the law’s primary objectives: consumer welfare, efficient allocation of resources, and competition fairness.

We have experienced lawyers who provide assistance and dispute resolution services in the field of Competition Law and Anti-Monopoly Law. Each of our lawyers possesses a deep understanding of various business structures, including relationships among producers, suppliers, distributors, consumers, as well as parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliated entities. Our lawyers are available for further communication in Indonesian and English.

We are well-positioned to offer innovative competition law advisory services, including legal dispute resolution, partnership structuring, and strategic solutions tailored to your specific needs.

  1. Providing legal advice and opinions in the field of Competition Law and Anti-Monopoly Law.
  2. Providing legal advice and opinions regarding the selection of business structures or cooperation arrangements between business actors/clients and other business entities.
  3. Drafting and/or reviewing business agreements and contracts.
  4. Providing early warnings to business actors/clients regarding agreements and/or business conduct that may potentially be classified as violations of Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition and/or monopolistic behavior.
  5. Providing legal advice, opinions, and assistance in conducting corporate actions, including dissolution, consolidation, liquidation, merger, and acquisition.
  6. Assisting business actors/clients during investigations and/or examinations conducted by the Indonesian Competition Commission (KPPU).
  7. Assisting business actors/clients during hearings before the Indonesian Competition Commission (KPPU) Council.
  8. Assisting business actors and the general public (clients) in filing reports to the Indonesian Competition Commission (KPPU) when they become victims of alleged monopolistic practices and/or unfair business competition by other business actors.
  1. Assisted dealers and main dealers of one of the sole brand-holder agents (Agen Tunggal Pemegang Merek) of a major Japanese multinational conglomerate engaged in automobile and motorcycle manufacturing during the preliminary examination stage conducted by the Indonesian Competition Commission (KPPU) regarding alleged violations of Law No. 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition and/or monopolistic conduct.
  2. Provided legal advice in a dispute involving a leading company engaged in foam materials, furniture products, and automotive interior parts manufacturing in connection with a conflict with one of its distributors

concerning alleged violations of Law No. 5 of 1999 relating to differentiated purchase price arrangements among distributors.

Please send us your inquiries regarding your needs, and we will contact you as soon as possible. Need More Information?

Scroll to Top