In 2016, Indonesia enacted Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases Involving Corporations. This Supreme Court Regulation clarifies the procedures for law enforcement against corporations as perpetrators of criminal offenses, which had previously been regulated in various special statutes outside the Penal Code (KUHP), such as laws governing Economic Crimes, Forestry, Environmental Protection and Management, the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering, and others.
The Regulation also shifts the traditional perspective on corporations as criminal offenders, a notion that had previously been rejected under the Dutch Wetboek van Strafrecht (WvS)—which served as the foundation for the current KUHP. Notably, the Wetboek van Strafrecht was drafted based on the principle or doctrine of societas delinquere non potest (a corporation cannot commit a criminal offense). This shift in legal principles and doctrines constitutes one of the reasons for the need to revise the KUHP.
More recently, on 2 January 2023, Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the Revised KUHP) was promulgated. The Revised KUHP will come into force three years from the date of its promulgation. In addition to responding to the shift in legal principles and doctrines, the Revised KUHP also introduces several new criminal offenses, including the crime of Apostasy under Article 302 of the Revised KUHP.
Several offenses under the Revised KUHP have proven controversial and have even been subjected to constitutional review petitions before the Constitutional Court prior to their entry into force. As of 7 March 2025, we note that eight petitions for judicial review of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Penal Code against the 1945 Constitution have been registered and decided. These petitions specifically challenged provisions regulating defamation (Article 433), slander (Article 434), offenses against the honor and dignity of the President, Vice President, government, and state institutions (Articles 218(1), 219, 240(1), and 241(1)), demonstrations (Article 256), corruption offenses (Articles 603 and 604), the death penalty (Article 100(1)), the offense of providing false statements by an advocate (Article 509), apostasy (Article 302(1)), and the use of the state emblem for purposes not authorized by law (Article 237(c)). All petitions were declared inadmissible on the grounds of prematurity, as the law in question has not yet come into force.
Our advocates possess a deep understanding of criminal law and extensive experience, both in assisting clients who are suspects facing criminal law enforcement proceedings and in representing clients as victims in filing reports or complaints regarding criminal acts committed against them.
Our advocates also have frequently worked with and are well accustomed to engaging with law enforcement authorities across various institutions, including the Police, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), Civil Servant Investigators for Environmental Affairs, the Prosecutor’s Office, and the Courts. We are well positioned to provide expert criminal law advice on how best to resolve your legal issues.