Labour Law

In the post–Covid-19 period, the Russia–Ukraine conflict in Europe, the Israel–Palestine conflict, the emergence of new economic blocs such as BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa),

Overview

In the post–Covid-19 period, the Russia–Ukraine conflict in Europe, the Israel–Palestine conflict, the emergence of new economic blocs such as BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), and the economic downturn—including inflation experienced by several developed nations such as Greece and Argentina—have collectively delivered significant economic shocks across countries. These impacts include a decline in consumer purchasing power, rising raw material costs, and other disruptions.

The same pressures have been felt by Foreign Investment Companies (PMA) and Domestic Investment Companies (PMDN), particularly those that rely on imported raw materials and/or operate under production licenses for export-oriented goods (especially for European and American markets). Several companies have ceased operations entirely, while others have survived by undertaking fundamental corporate restructuring measures, including workforce downsizing, wage scale adjustments, accelerated technological transformation—from labor-intensive to modern operations—relocation to regions with lower minimum wages and/or new industrial zones, and other strategies.

From 2019 to 2024, we have assisted numerous companies in adopting various restructuring formats to preserve business continuity. We have also represented many workers in securing the best possible settlements in employment disputes and/or terminations resulting from restructuring or company closures.

The Indonesian Government’s efforts to boost the national economy—through investment facilitation initiatives under Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation and its subsequent regulatory developments—were met with strong resistance from the labor community. Workers argued that the Job Creation Law undermines labor rights, benefits large corporations, facilitates unilateral termination of employment (PHK), increases the risk of lower minimum wages, and opens the possibility of perpetual contract work (without clear pathways to permanent employment).

Following the Constitutional Court Decision No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023 on the judicial review of several provisions of Law No. 6 of 2023 (which ratified Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 2 of 2022 on Job Creation), several articles were granted conditionally constitutional status with constitutional interpretations. These include Article 42(4) in Article 81 point 4 of Law No. 6 of 2023: emphasizing the prioritization of Indonesian workers in the employment of foreign workers. Article 56(3) in Article 81 point 12 of Law No. 6 of 2023: clarifying that the completion period for a specific job under a Fixed-Term Employment Agreement (PKWT) cannot exceed 5 (five) years, including extensions.

This decision is viewed as restoring legal certainty and providing new hope for workers regarding employment contracts, prioritization of Indonesian labor, and fair wages. Given the dynamic regulatory landscape in Indonesia, professional attention is essential. Our experienced advocates provide comprehensive legal protection for both companies and employees in the field of employment law. Our team has in-depth knowledge of the legal requirements applicable to human resource management, employer–employee relations, and engagement with labor unions, aiming to minimize conflict between employers and workers. Our advocates are available for consultation in both Indonesian and English.
We are well positioned to provide holistic solutions for all your Employment Law needs.

  1. Legal advice and opinions in the field of Employment Law.
  2. Drafting of employment-related documents, including Company Regulations (PP), Collective Labor Agreements (PKB), internal decrees for management (Directors, HR Managers, etc.), internal employee notifications (e.g., Confirmation of Permanent Employment, Warning Letters, Suspension Letters, Termination Letters), Fixed-Term Employment Agreements (PKWT) and their mandatory registrations, registration of Settlement Agreements (Perjanjian Bersama) in court for termination cases, Wage Scale formulation, and documentation related to Foreign Workers and Technology Transfer.
  3. Internal company assistance in dealings with Labor Unions (if any), labor authorities, and/or local government stakeholders (e.g., Village Officers, community youth groups), especially for labor-intensive industries requiring local workforce absorption.
  4. Labor compliance audits, including wage structure and wage scale, working hours and overtime, BPJS Kesehatan, BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, and early-warning identification of potential violations such as union busting.
  5. Assistance in Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement (PPHI), including Bipartite, Tripartite, and proceedings before the Industrial Relations Court up to the Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung).
  1. Assisted a Foreign Investment garment manufacturing company—licensed producer for Puma, Adidas, Nike, and Lacoste—in negotiating, drafting, and executing a Settlement Agreement (Perjanjian Bersama/PB) with employees, including registration in court, in connection with company closure and subsequent termination of employment.
  2. Assisted the same garment manufacturing group in negotiations and PB execution with employees related to corporate relocation.
  3. Assisted an international telecommunications company in negotiating and concluding a PB with its employees—registered in court—related to termination due to efficiency measures to prevent losses during the Covid-19 impact.
  4. Assisted one of Indonesia’s largest conventional general insurance companies in negotiating, drafting, and executing a PB connected to corporate acquisition activities.
  5. Represented a Foreign Investment garment manufacturing company facing a lawsuit filed by 190 former employees seeking the annulment of a Settlement Agreement already recorded by the Industrial Relations Court, with claims amounting to approximately IDR 8,000,000,000. The company prevailed in the case.
  6. Represented an individual former employee of a manufacturing company who was terminated after refusing relocation—misclassified by the company as a voluntary resignation in order to avoid severance payment. The employee won, and the company was ordered to pay Severance Pay, Service Recognition Pay, Compensation of Rights, and Separation Pay in accordance with prevailing labor laws and the applicable Collective Labor Agreement.
Scroll to Top